Monday 3 January 2011

Task Four - Additional Research

Reality TV – “How real is real?”

“The word reality no longer means what it meant”

-

Media Studies the Essential rescource.

‘Audience participation and reality TV ‘

“It is the audiences that are now in control”

By Philip Rayner, Peter Wall and Stephen Kruger

-

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96294653

“movies by their very nature glamorize everything they touch”

-

“if you're looking for anything like accuracy in movies, you're barking up the wrong tree. It's simply not possible”.

-

http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Real-is-Reality-TV?&id=191704

Reality TV show has real world people instead of paid actors and actresses. These shows are supposed to portray real life situations and events that affect people's lives. However, participants of reality TV shows are sometimes willing to go outside of their boundaries and do things that they would not necessarily do in their normal lives, without the cameras following their every move.

-

“For some people, these shows help them realize that their lives are not all that bad after all.”

-

”Reality TV shows have affected society in many different ways. Some audiences get hooked on these shows because they help them escape their own real lives. The shows vary in theme and material and every show is designed to attract the biggest possible audience. The bigger the audience, the more money the shows make”

-

“According to a poll by CNN, 57% of 1016 adults believe that Reality TV shows provide a distorted picture of events while another 23% say the shows are "totally phoney". The amount of pressure for TV ratings pushes people to make the show more interesting.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2010/dec/27/reality-tv-x-factor-strictly-stuart-heritage

their flaws made them so identifiably human

Task Three Historical text. 1971

Historical text.

An American Family – 1971.

Listed #32 on TV Guide's 50 Greatest TV Shows of All Time

The seven members of the family were:

  • William Carberry (Bill) Loud (born January 22, 1921)
  • Patricia (Pat) Loud (born October 4, 1926)
  • Lance Loud (June 26, 1951 – December 22, 2001)
  • Kevin Robert Loud (born January 28, 1953)
  • Grant Loud (born May 5, 1954 in Eugene, Oregon)
  • Delilah Ann Loud (born October 15, 1955)
  • Michele Loud (born October 15, 1957)

First ever documentary/TV Show to be considered a reality television show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sF3bs4xvbYg

This is a montage of clips from An American Family 1971.

Watching these clips, it clearly indicates that the typical codes and conventions of a reality TV had been constructed from shows as such. An example of this is the backing noise that is heard within the clips. This is also shown in reality shows such as Big Brother. Where u hear the background noises without any editing, emphasising that it is reality and not tempered with in any way. Also the shots in which the show is taken in. For example. P.O.V illustrates that it is reality as it also gives the readers a sense of reality as if they are there personally watching everything that is going on. The ongoing sequences show that this is not in any way constructed as what is being said and shown is not scripted.

The similarities between An American Family and The X-Factor is that what is being said on screen in front of camera has not been constructed in any shape or form as it both shows make mistakes in their speeches. For example; Cheryl Cole and Simon Cowell, both make upfront mistakes and cut one another off within the show which portrays the reality of TV. This is similarly shown in An American Family as what they say is being shown with pauses and faults within their speech.

However there are many differences such as the improvement in technology which has lead to a more glamourized and sophisticated version of reality TV. This is done via; diverse shots, increase in more lighting styles and effects/ introduction of higher quality mikes and camera E.g – HD etc. Therefore what is shown on screen is majorly different to what u may have seen before.

Socially there has been a change too, as an example, women today show cleavage on screen e.g contestants and judges aim to look sexy and attractive, however this would not have been the case during the 90s therefore since then there has been major changes within the media industry. Also inequality has also been rinsed out in some form, as people today achieve success with their own credibility and talent and is certainly not dependant on their social class or family status etc.

Task Two - Bibliography (SO FAR)

Bibliography.

Michael Wesch - http://ksuanth.weebly.com/wesch.html

Steph Hendry's article in Media Magazine issue 30 -http://www.mediasupport.org.uk/PDF/MediaMagazine28_download.pdf

Graeme Turner's book "Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn" - Chapter 2 -http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2009/09/15/graeme-turners-ordinary-people-and-the-media-the-demotic-turn/

Reality bites: documentary in the 21st century

http://ashakabadehmest4.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-can-philosophy-teach-us-about_10.html

What’s happening to reality TV? http://community.realitytvworld.com/boards/DCForumID6/35923.shtml

Quotte 1

http://www.quotegarden.com/television.html

UGC

https://englishandmedia.co.uk

Task One

Analysis of X-Factor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5UQD61Tg3E

This is an episode from the recent x-factor series at the judge’s house. It is a clear example for why shows such as X-factor can be labeled ad being constructed rather than reality. However the most obvious example is the formation of the group One Direction. All the boys had initially auditioned as solo's but as the show progressed Simon Cowell announced the coming together of One Direction. As a result of this, it could be argued that this isn't reality as they hadn't been accepted on the terms and intentions they had in mind when auditioning but the terms and conditions of Simon Cowell. Regardless this being beneficial for One Direction, the truth is they auditioned as solo's and wanted to make it to the top as solo's.

Therefore it is clear that changes like this can lead to audiences thinking the show is in some way constructed rather than reality. Also, changes like this may have been considered as it may be considered beneficial for the institution and cause a higher viewing rate amongst the audiences. This clearly had been proven, as the formation of One Direction caused X-Factors viewing rates to shoot up majorly. This is because the group can be seen as "eye candy" for its primary audience of young teens aged from 13 +, purely on the basis of their looks. However they could also appeal to a much older audience of 18+ through their given vocals, their on screen mannerism and the glamorous mise-en-scene which helps glamorize the group. They are given specific ques and vocals to suit their voice and allow the performance to flow, but this is done by a professional singing coach Sawan Kotecha therefore they are being told what to do and are simply puppets acting upon which string is pulled, therefore this is another reason for why the show could be considered constructed. Also, this could be considered as their new constructed identities therefore allow them to attract audiences of all ages.

The use of high key lighting helps glamorize the contestants for example their flawless make up is enlightened with the use of high top key lighting therefore audiences would aspire to look like them or achieve flawless skin as them. The use of medium close ups and extreme close ups enhances this portrayal of looking like a celebrity. The use of such a variety of shots follows the typical codes and conventions of a reality TV show as they completely change the contestant from scratch with their appearance, vocally and their character mannerism shown on screen. However in this episode the use of a long shot is used constantly perhaps to show the change in their appearance from normal young teens to very stylish/slick and cool representations in order to attract their audiences.

The genre is obviously reality and entertainment, therefore it is clear these changes within contestants are made to follow the correct conventions of entertainment, as seeing the transformations within the contestants gratifies the audiences needs of entertainment. This then creates alternative representations from when they first auditioned. Their “new” identities connote their success within the show as their new and transformed representations enables to get so far. Audiences could also view this as personal identification, for example, for someone who had nothing then found themselves living the dream. Examples of people as such are previous contestants from other shows or even the same show. E.g. Susan Boyle, JLS, Spellbound, Signature and Leona Lewis.

Theories related to this episode and the show in general are the hypodermic needle and Todrovs theory of the equilibriums. This is because throughout the show and this specific episode, the contestants are being judged. As an example the equilibrium could be their first audition and being put through to the live shows, the dis-equilibrium could be them voted out and the new equilibrium could be that they are brought back into the show through the wild card system. Therefore I feel Todrovs theory clearly fits in with the X-Factor and this episode specifically as One Direction are being judged but at the same time have reached far in the competition as they are at the judges houses.

On the other hand, the hypodermic needle also fits in with the show as the construction of the contestants new identities in many ways hypodermically injects the ideology that they are already celebrity or famous as they have been transformed in a major way and have got so far in the show. However I feel Giddens theory of Hegemony is also presented as the contestants for example One Direction are portrayed and represented as superior than other ordinary teens. Therefore this difference in status is shown throughout the show.